Jason Friedman's literature database
Home
|
Show All
|
Simple Search
|
Advanced Search
You must login to submit this form!
Login
Quick Search:
Field:
main fields
author
title
publication
keywords
abstract
contains:
...
Edit the following record:
Author
...
is Editor
Title
...
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Book Chapter
Book Whole
Conference Article
Conference Volume
Journal
Magazine Article
Manual
Manuscript
Map
Miscellaneous
Newspaper Article
Patent
Report
Software
Year
...
Publication
...
Abbreviated Journal
...
Volume
...
Issue
...
Pages
...
Keywords
...
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effects of adding vibrotactile feedback to myoelectric prosthesis users on the performance time and visual attention in a dual-task paradigm. Design: A repeated-measures design with a counterbalanced order of two conditions. Setting: Laboratory setting. Subjects: Transradial amputees using a myoelectric prosthesis with normal or corrected eyesight (N=12, median age=65 ± 13 years). Exclusion criteria were orthopedic or neurologic problems. Interventions: Subjects performed grasping tasks with their prosthesis, while controlling a virtual car on a road with their intact hand. The dual task was performed twice: with and without vibrotactile feedback. Main measures: Performance time of each of the grasping tasks and gaze behavior, measured by the number of times the subjects shifted their gaze toward their hand, the relative time they applied their attention to the screen, and percentage of error in the secondary task. Results: The mean performance time was significantly shorter (P=0.024) when using vibrotactile feedback (93.2 ± 9.6 seconds) compared with the performance time measured when vibrotactile feedback was not available (107.8 ± 20.3seconds). No significant differences were found between the two conditions in the number of times the gaze shifted from the screen to the hand, in the time the subjects applied their attention to the screen, and in the time the virtual car was off-road, as a percentage of the total game time (51.4 ± 15.7 and 50.2 ± 19.5, respectively). Conclusion: Adding vibrotactile feedback improved performance time during grasping in a dual-task paradigm. Prosthesis users may use vibrotactile feedback to perform better during daily tasks, when multiple cognitive demands are present.
Address
...
Corporate Author
...
Thesis
Bachelor's thesis
Master's thesis
Ph.D. thesis
Diploma thesis
Doctoral thesis
Habilitation thesis
Publisher
...
Place of Publication
...
Editor
...
Language
...
Summary Language
...
Original Title
...
Series Editor
...
Series Title
...
Abbreviated Series Title
...
Series Volume
...
Series Issue
...
Edition
...
ISSN
...
ISBN
...
Medium
...
Area
...
Expedition
...
Conference
...
Notes
...
Approved
yes
no
Location
Call Number
...
Serial
Marked
yes
no
Copy
true
fetch
ordered
false
Selected
yes
no
User Keys
...
User Notes
...
User File
...
User Groups
...
Cite Key
...
Related
...
File
URL
...
DOI
...
Online publication. Cite with this text:
...
Location Field:
don't touch
add
remove
my name & email address
Home
CQL Search
|
Library Search
|
Show Record
|
Extract Citations
Help