Warning: A non-numeric value encountered in /home/public/export/export_atomxml.php on line 32
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/export/export_atomxml.php:32) in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5344
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/export/export_atomxml.php:32) in /home/public/search.php on line 1880 Jason Friedman's literature databaseDisplays records where serial is equal to 792024-04-25T22:10:24+00:00Jason Friedman's literature databasewrite.to.jason@gmail.comhttps://refbase.nfshost.com/Web Reference Database (http://refbase.sourceforge.net)https://refbase.nfshost.com/img/favicon.icohttps://refbase.nfshost.com/img/logo.pnghttps://refbase.nfshost.com/show.php?where=serial%20%3D%2079&exportType=xml&submit=Export&exportFormat=Atom%20XML111https://refbase.nfshost.com/show.php?record=79
Compensatory Versus Noncompensatory Shoulder Movements Used for Reaching in Stroke
Levin, M. F., Liebermann, D. G., Parmet, Y., & Berman, S. (2015). Compensatory Versus Noncompensatory Shoulder Movements Used for Reaching in Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, .
BACKGROUND: The extent to which the upper-limb flexor synergy constrains or compensates for arm motor impairment during reaching is controversial. This synergy can be quantified with a minimal marker set describing movements of the arm-plane. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether and how (a) upper-limb flexor synergy in patients with chronic stroke contributes to reaching movements to different arm workspace locations and (b) reaching deficits can be characterized by arm-plane motion. METHODS: Sixteen post-stroke and 8 healthy control subjects made unrestrained reaching movements to targets located in ipsilateral, central, and contralateral arm workspaces. Arm-plane, arm, and trunk motion, and their temporal and spatial linkages were analyzed. RESULTS: Individuals with moderate/severe stroke used greater arm-plane movement and compensatory trunk movement compared to those with mild stroke and control subjects. Arm-plane and trunk movements were more temporally coupled in stroke compared with controls. Reaching accuracy was related to different segment and joint combinations for each target and group: arm-plane movement in controls and mild stroke subjects, and trunk and elbow movements in moderate/severe stroke subjects. Arm-plane movement increased with time since stroke and when combined with trunk rotation, discriminated between different subject groups for reaching the central and contralateral targets. Trunk movement and arm-plane angle during target reaches predicted the subject group. CONCLUSIONS: The upper-limb flexor synergy was used adaptively for reaching accuracy by patients with mild, but not moderate/severe stroke. The flexor synergy, as parameterized by the amount of arm-plane motion, can be used by clinicians to identify levels of motor recovery in patients with stroke.
Compensatory Versus Noncompensatory Shoulder Movements Used for Reaching in StrokeLevin, M.F.Liebermann, D.G.Parmet, Y.Berman, S.info:doi/10.1177/1545968315613863info:pmid/26510934openurl:?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fhttps%3A%2F%2Frefbase.nfshost.com%2F&genre=article&atitle=Compensatory%20Versus%20Noncompensatory%20Shoulder%20Movements%20Used%20for%20Reaching%20in%20Stroke&title=Neurorehabilitation%20and%20Neural%20Repair&stitle=Neurorehabil%20Neural%20Repair&issn=1545-9683&date=2015&aulast=Levin&aufirst=M.F.&au=Liebermann%2C%20D.G.&au=Parmet%2C%20Y.&au=Berman%2C%20S.&id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1177%2F1545968315613863&sid=refbase%3AJFcitekey:Levin_etal2015Levin, M. F., Liebermann, D. G., Parmet, Y., & Berman, S. (2015). Compensatory Versus Noncompensatory Shoulder Movements Used for Reaching in Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, .2015JournalArticletextadaptationarm movementcompensationkinematicsrecoveryrehabilitationurl:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26510934English1545-9683Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair2015