|
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Deprecated: htmlentities(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/public/includes/include.inc.php on line 5605
Lowenthal-Raz, J., Liebermann, D. G., Friedman, J., & Soroker, N. (2024). Kinematic descriptors of arm reaching movement are sensitive to hemisphere-specific immediate neuromodulatory effects of transcranial direct current stimulation post stroke. Sci Rep, 14(1), 11971.
Abstract: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) exerts beneficial effects on motor recovery after stroke, presumably by enhancement of adaptive neural plasticity. However, patients with extensive damage may experience null or deleterious effects with the predominant application mode of anodal (excitatory) stimulation of the damaged hemisphere. In such cases, excitatory stimulation of the non-damaged hemisphere might be considered. Here we asked whether tDCS exerts a measurable effect on movement quality of the hemiparetic upper limb, following just a single treatment session. Such effect may inform on the hemisphere that should be excited. Using a single-blinded crossover experimental design, stroke patients and healthy control subjects were assessed before and after anodal, cathodal and sham tDCS, each provided during a single session of reaching training (repeated point-to-point hand movement on an electronic tablet). Group comparisons of endpoint kinematics at baseline-number of peaks in the speed profile (NoP; smoothness), hand-path deviations from the straight line (SLD; accuracy) and movement time (MT; speed)-disclosed greater NoP, larger SLD and longer MT in the stroke group. NoP and MT revealed an advantage for anodal compared to sham stimulation of the lesioned hemisphere. NoP and MT improvements under anodal stimulation of the non-lesioned hemisphere correlated positively with the severity of hemiparesis. Damage to specific cortical regions and white-matter tracts was associated with lower kinematic gains from tDCS. The study shows that simple descriptors of movement kinematics of the hemiparetic upper limb are sensitive enough to demonstrate gain from neuromodulation by tDCS, following just a single session of reaching training. Moreover, the results show that tDCS-related gain is affected by the severity of baseline motor impairment, and by lesion topography.
|
|
Tamir-Ostrover, H., Hassin-Baer, S., Fay-Karmon, T., & Friedman, J. (2024). Quantifying Changes in Dexterity as a Result of Piano Training in People with Parkinson's Disease. Sensors (Basel), 24(11).
Abstract: People with Parkinson's disease often show deficits in dexterity, which, in turn, can lead to limitations in performing activities of daily life. Previous studies have suggested that training in playing the piano may improve or prevent a decline in dexterity in this population. In this pilot study, we tested three participants on a six-week, custom, piano-based training protocol, and quantified dexterity before and after the intervention using a sensor-enabled version of the nine-hole peg test, the box and block test, a test of finger synergies using unidimensional force sensors, and the Quantitative Digitography test using a digital piano, as well as selected relevant items from the motor parts of the MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) quality of life questionnaire. The participants showed improved dexterity following the training program in several of the measures used. This pilot study proposes measures that can track changes in dexterity as a result of practice in people with Parkinson's disease and describes a potential protocol that needs to be tested in a larger cohort.
|
|
Wilf, M., Korakin, A., Bahat, Y., Koren, O., Galor, N., Dagan, O., et al. (2024). Using virtual reality-based neurocognitive testing and eye tracking to study naturalistic cognitive-motor performance. Neuropsychologia, 194, 108744.
Abstract: Natural human behavior arises from continuous interactions between the cognitive and motor domains. However, assessments of cognitive abilities are typically conducted using pen and paper tests, i.e., in isolation from “real life” cognitive-motor behavior and in artificial contexts. In the current study, we aimed to assess cognitive-motor task performance in a more naturalistic setting while recording multiple motor and eye tracking signals. Specifically, we aimed to (i) delineate the contribution of cognitive and motor components to overall task performance and (ii) probe for a link between cognitive-motor performance and pupil size. To that end, we used a virtual reality (VR) adaptation of a well-established neurocognitive test for executive functions, the 'Color Trails Test' (CTT). The VR-CTT involves performing 3D reaching movements to follow a trail of numbered targets. To tease apart the cognitive and motor components of task performance, we included two additional conditions: a condition where participants only used their eyes to perform the CTT task (using an eye tracking device), incurring reduced motor demands, and a condition where participants manually tracked visually-cued targets without numbers on them, incurring reduced cognitive demands. Our results from a group of 30 older adults (>65) showed that reducing cognitive demands shortened completion times more extensively than reducing motor demands. Conditions with higher cognitive demands had longer target search time, as well as decreased movement execution velocity and head-hand coordination. We found larger pupil sizes in the more cognitively demanding conditions, and an inverse correlation between pupil size and completion times across individuals in all task conditions. Lastly, we found a possible link between VR-CTT performance measures and clinical signatures of participants (fallers versus non-fallers). In summary, performance and pupil parameters were mainly dependent on task cognitive load, while maintaining systematic interindividual differences. We suggest that this paradigm opens the possibility for more detailed profiling of individual cognitive-motor performance capabilities in older adults and other at-risk populations.
|
|
Grinberg, A., Strong, A., Strandberg, J., Selling, J., Liebermann, D. G., Bjorklund, M., et al. (2024). Electrocortical activity associated with movement-related fear: a methodological exploration of a threat-conditioning paradigm involving destabilising perturbations during quiet standing. Exp Brain Res, .
Abstract: Musculoskeletal trauma often leads to lasting psychological impacts stemming from concerns of future injuries. Often referred to as kinesiophobia or re-injury anxiety, such concerns have been shown to hinder return to physical activity and are believed to increase the risk for secondary injuries. Screening for re-injury anxiety is currently restricted to subjective questionnaires, which are prone to self-report bias. We introduce a novel approach to objectively identify electrocortical activity associated with the threat of destabilising perturbations. We aimed to explore its feasibility among non-injured persons, with potential future implementation for screening of re-injury anxiety. Twenty-three participants stood blindfolded on a translational balance perturbation platform. Consecutive auditory stimuli were provided as low (neutral stimulus [CS(-)]) or high (conditioned stimulus [CS(+)]) tones. For the main experimental protocol (Protocol I), half of the high tones were followed by a perturbation in one of eight unpredictable directions. A separate validation protocol (Protocol II) requiring voluntary squatting without perturbations was performed with 12 participants. Event-related potentials (ERP) were computed from electroencephalography recordings and significant time-domain components were detected using an interval-wise testing procedure. High-amplitude early contingent negative variation (CNV) waves were significantly greater for CS(+) compared with CS(-) trials in all channels for Protocol I (> 521-800ms), most prominently over frontal and central midline locations (P </= 0.001). For Protocol II, shorter frontal ERP components were observed (541-609ms). Our test paradigm revealed electrocortical activation possibly associated with movement-related fear. Exploring the discriminative validity of the paradigm among individuals with and without self-reported re-injury anxiety is warranted.
|
|
Levin, M. F., Berman, S., Weiss, N., Parmet, Y., Banina, M. C., Frenkel-Toledo, S., et al. (2023). ENHANCE proof-of-concept three-arm randomized trial: effects of reaching training of the hemiparetic upper limb restricted to the spasticity-free elbow range (Vol. 13).
Abstract: Post-stroke motor recovery processes remain unknown. Timescales and patterns of upper-limb (UL) recovery suggest a major impact of biological factors, with modest contributions from rehabilitation. We assessed a novel impairment-based training motivated by motor control theory where reaching occurs within the spasticity-free elbow range. Patients with subacute stroke (</= 6 month; n = 46) and elbow flexor spasticity were randomly allocated to a 10-day UL training protocol, either personalized by restricting reaching to the spasticity-free elbow range defined by the tonic stretch reflex threshold (TSRT) or non-personalized (non-restricted) and with/without anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Outcomes assessed before, after, and 1 month post-intervention were elbow flexor TSRT angle and reach-to-grasp arm kinematics (primary) and stretch reflex velocity sensitivity, clinical impairment, and activity (secondary). Results were analyzed for 3 groups as well as those of the effects of impairment-based training. Clinical measures improved in both groups. Spasticity-free range training resulted in faster and smoother reaches, smaller (i.e., better) arm-plane path length, and closer-to-normal shoulder/elbow movement patterns. Non-personalized training improved clinical scores without improving arm kinematics, suggesting that clinical measures do not account for movement quality. Impairment-based training within a spasticity-free elbow range is promising since it may improve clinical scores together with arm movement quality.Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique Identifier: NCT02725853; Initial registration date: 01/04/2016.
|
|
|